Sanjay Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36035 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2022 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== SANJAY MAHTO Son of Pattu Mahto Resident of Village - Sangthu, P.S.- and Distt.- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anand Kishore Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 153(A), 386, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

The informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to election Saurav Mahto fired at the informant but missed, Pappu Mandal fired causing injury on chest of Md. Masleuddin, Nitish Mandal fired causing injury on right arm and shoulder of Md. Mujammil and accused even demanded extortion of Rs.5 lakhs. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from bare

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36035 of 2022(2) dt.29-11-2022 2/2 perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation is alleged against the accused persons of assault and firing but as far as this petitioner is concerned, no specific allegation has been alleged against him. The allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 30 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T