Ganpati Mandal v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48353 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -365 Year- 2012 Thana -DARBHANGA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictDARBHANGA ====================================================== Ganpati Mandal, S/o Sahadeo Mandal, Resident of Village Kahua, Police Station- Biraul, District Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Ruma Kumari, W/o Ganpati Mandal, D/o Mahi Narain Mandal Resident of Village Kanhauli, P.S. Bahera, District Darbhanga. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umanath Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar No. 2(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 14-01-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is in custody since 24.11.2014 in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the complainant and he is ready to lead conjugal life with her with full dignity and honour. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48353 of 2014 (2) dt.14-01-2015 2/2 Benipur, Darbhanga in Complaint Case No.365/2012 (Trial No.335/2014) with the following conditions : 1.

One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.

2.

The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3.

The petitioner will be well represented in the court.

4.

In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T