← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10781/2015rejected

Md. Sajid @ Masoom @ Sajid v. The State Of Bihar

2015-06-24Mr. Justice Amaresh Kumar Lal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10781 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -641 Year- 2014 Thana -FORBESGANJ DistrictARRARIA ====================================================== Md. Sajid @ Masoom @ Sajid Son of Md. Majium Resident of Village - Rahmatganj (Rewahi), P.S. - Narpatganj, District - Araria. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh-I(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 24-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392 and 411 of IPC. Allegation is that at about 9.30 p.m. while the informant was returning to his house by his motorcycle, three persons stopped his motorcycle at the point of arms and snatched Mobile Nos. 9430004586 and 8294907380 and a cash of Rs.15,000/-, thereafter also snatched his motorcycle and fled away.

It is submitted that FIR was lodged against unknown. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He was apprehended while he was standing in Mela. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10781 of 2015 (4) dt.24-06-2015 2/2 motorcycle was standing there. After investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the witnesses.

Learned counsel for the State submits that during investigation, it has come to light that petitioner is one of the miscreants and looted motorcycle and one mobile no. 9430004586 has been recovered from his conscious possession. He has also criminal antecedents of similar nature.

Considering the facts and circumstances, in my opinion, the petitioner does not deserve bail at this stage. His prayer for bail is rejected.

Let the trial be expedited.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U