Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40092/2024dismissed

Deolal Paswan @ Deo Lal Paswan @ Devlal Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-24Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40092 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2009 Thana- MAGADH MEDICAL COLLEGE District- Gaya ====================================================== Deolal Paswan @ Deo Lal Paswan @ Devlal Paswan Son Of Late Bansi Paswan Village- Bemta, Ps- Magadh Medical, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Atul Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2024 Heard Mr. Aryan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Atul Chandra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 61 of 2009, F.I.R. dated 14.07.2009 for the offences punishable under Sections 304(b)/34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. It appears from the record that the petitioner has earlier moved for grant of anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 41476 of 2010 which was rejected by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.03.2011. Then, again the petitioner has moved for grant of anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40092 of 2024(2) dt.24-07-2024 2/2 No. 36950 of 2013 which was also rejected by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.12.2023.

4. It appears from the aforesaid that the Court had twice rejected the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner and repeatedly directed the petitioner to surrender before the learned Court below long back in the years 2011 and 2013 but till date the petitioner has not surrendered before the learned Court below and now the petitioner has moved before this Court for the third time for grant of anticipatory bail without any basis.

5. In view of the above, no case is made out for interference of this Court and the application stands dismissed with the direction to the petitioner to surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 4 weeks from today and seek regular bail.

6. With the aforesaid direction, the application stands dismissed.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T