← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13685/2021withdrawn

Dr. Sanjeev Kumar v. Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University

2025-08-25Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13685 of 2021 ====================================================== Dr. Sanjeev Kumar son of Late Shambhoo Nath Verma, resident of VillagePankhatoli, Police Station-Kazi Mohammadpur, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University through its Registrar, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar.

2.

The Vice-Chancellor, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar.

3.

Dr. Ramesh Chandra Srivastava the Vice-Chancellor, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar. 4.

The Registrar, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar.

5.

The Deputy Registrar, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar.

6.

The Dean (Agriculture), Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar.

7.

The Honorary Director, Comprehensive Cost of Cultivation Scheme, Department of Agricultural Economics, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Chandra Mohan Singh, Advocate Mr. Vijay Shankar Upadhyay, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the case, fresh cause of action has arisen and therefore, the instant writ application has become infructuous.

3. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands

Patna High Court CWJC No.13685 of 2021(5) dt.25-08-2025 2/2 disposed of as infructous.

5. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate steps in accordance with law for fresh cause of action.

(Ajit Kumar, J) shikha/- U