Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31345/2019bail granted

Rubi Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-06Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31345 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-458 Year-2018 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== RUBI KUMARI Wife of Brijnandan Prasad Resident of Village - Dumrawan, P.S.- Deepnagar, Dist.- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mrigendra Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 06-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest for the offences alleged under Section 420, 467,468, 471, 120(B) IPC registered in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 458/2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the accusation that she has got employment as a Primary Teacher, Mohra SC, Sub-division Mohra, on the basis of forged marksheet of Bihar School Examination Board. A statement is made at the Bar that the petitioner has submitted her resignation after the amnesty period and undertakes that she will not join the school as Primary Teacher in future. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that it may, in the event of petitioner's arrest or surrender within four weeks hereof let the above named petitioner be released on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- [ten thousand] with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM XIII, Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 458/2018, subject to the conditions as laid

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31345 of 2019(2) dt.06-08-2019 2/2 down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make herself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall be well represented in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, her bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

5. The provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed upon verification that the petitioner has resigned from service.

6. The authorities shall be at liberty to take steps for recovery of the salary already drawn by the petitioner during her employment as Primary Teacher.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U