Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32542/2025bail rejected

Azad Ahmad @ Golu Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-13Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32542 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2024 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Azad Ahmad @ Golu Ahmad S/O Rajji Ahmad R/O Village- Parkari, P.SShivsagar, Distt.- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nalin Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 13-08-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Shivsagar P.S. Case No.180 of 2024 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 354 and 34 of the IPC pending before the court of C.J.M., Rohtas.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against 13 named accused persons including the petitioner against whom there is allegation of assault due to which informant's head got injured.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32542 of 2025(3) dt.13-08-2025 2/2 case. He further submits that due to dirty village politics and enmity, the name of the petitioner has figured in this case. He further submits that both parties are co-villagers and dispute is going on due to drainage.

5. Learned Counsel also submits that antecedent of the petitioner is clean and further submits that there is no allegation of act or overt act against him.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is allegation of assault due to which injury has been caused to the informant.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

8. However, trial court is directed to consider the regular bail application of the petitioner, if he surrenders within 6 weeks from today and prays for regular bail, then trial court shall pass order without being prejudice of the present order preferably on the same day.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T