Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43327/2021rejected

Chunu Rai @ Sarvottam Rai @ Chunnu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-28Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43327 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2021 Thana- KOCHAS District- Rohtas ====================================================== CHUNU RAI @ SARVOTTAM RAI @ CHUNNU RAI SON OF LATE ABHAY NARAYAN RAY R/O VILLAGE- SALATHUA, P.S.- KUDRA, DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-04-2022 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

Petitioner apprehend arrest in connection with Kochas (Parsathua O.P.) P.S. Case No. 28 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under section 302, 307, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the first information report and he has been falsely implicated in this case due to previous enmity and local village politics. There is no motive for committing the alleged occurrence. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is named accused in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43327 of 2021(4) dt.28-04-2022 2/2 the first information report and there are allegations against him. During investigation also materials have come showing his complicity. Moreover, petitioner has long criminal history. Petitioner, therefore, does not deserve to be granted the privilege of bail.

Considering the nature of allegations levelled, the materials available on record and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court does not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The same is, therefore, rejected.

mcv/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T