Akhtar Ali @ Akhtar Alam And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49790 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -328 Year- 2014 Thana -BAGHA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================
1. Akhtar Ali @ Akhtar Alam son of Late Dost Mohammad null
2. Rajai Mian son of Late Jagati Mian
3. Hasnain Mian son of Late Suleman Mian
4. Bhola Mian son of Jainul Mian All residents of Village - Ratanmala, P.S. - Bagaha, District - West Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners are accused in connection with Bagaha P.S. Case No. 328 of 2014 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation of informant Akhtar Hussain is that in course of ploughing the field, petitioners, Rajai Mian and Hasnain Mian caused injury to the informant with iron rod on his head and Hussnain Mian assaulted to the father of the informant, Ahmad Hussain with iron rod on his head. Thereafter, the petitioners and other co-accused persons caused injury indiscriminately to the informant and his father.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49790 of 2014 (2) dt.03-03-2015 2/2 petitioners submits that occurrence took place due to land dispute in between the parties, in which informant and his father have sustained injury. It is also submitted that petitioners are in custody since August, 2014.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Bagaha P.S. Case No. 328 of 2014. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the parents/close relatives of the petitioners. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) Shail/- U T