Krishna Gopal Sharma And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.564 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3484 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Krishna Gopal Sharma Son of Late Prakash Sharma, resident of Jagir Mohalla, Ward No. 31, Begusarai, Police Station- Town Thana, P.O. and District- Begusarai.

2.

Rajeev Kumar Son of Jai Prakash Poddar, resident of Main Road, Begusarai, Police Station town Thana, P.O. and District- Begusarai. 3.

Rakesh Kumar, Son of Late Arjun Prasad, resident of Mohalla Jama Masjid Power House Road, Police Station Town Thana, P.O. and DistrictBegusarai. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Begusarai Municipal Corporation Commissioner, Begusarai. 3.

The Municipal Commissioner, Begusarai Municipal Corporation, Begusarai. 4.

The Additional Commissioner, Begusarai Municipal Corporation, Begusarai. 5.

The Executive Engineer, Bhavan Pramandal, opposite Veer Kunwar Park, Begusarai.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Ranjan For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 02-12-2019 Appellants have prayed for the following reliefs:- "This memo of appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17.04.2018 (not pronounced) passed by Hon'ble Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra in C.W.J.C.No. 3484 of 2018 (Krishna Gopal Sharma and Others vrs. The State of Bihar and Others) whereby and whereunder the aforesaid writ petition has been dismissed in limine and order of demolition of shops

Patna High Court L.P.A No.564 of 2018(7) dt.02-12-2019 2/2 have been upheld."

Undisputedly, the building, in question, stands demolished and rebuilt. As such with the passage of time, the present appeal has become infructuous.

The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is reserved to the appellants to initiate appropriate proceeding in accordance with law for surviving issues, if so required in this appeal. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) sujit/- U