Jai Ram Sah @ Rai Ram Saw And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8752 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -56 Year- 2014 Thana -CHANDI District- BHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Jai Ram Sah @ Jai Ram Saw, son of Late Ram Varosa Sah,

2. Deo Sakhi Devi, wife of Jai Ram Sah @ Jai Ram Saw, both resident of village- Mathiyapur, P.S.- Chandi, District- Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pronati Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2/ 03-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304-B, 201/34 Indian Penal Code. Considering that the Petitioners are the parents-inlaw and claim to have been living separately, let the Petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of `5,000/-(Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No.56 of 2014, subject to the conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8752 of 2015 (2) dt.03-03-2015 2/2 genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) JA/- U T