Patna High CourtCWJC/3655/1998dismissed

Surendra Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-16Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.3655 of 1998 (6) dt.16-02-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3655 of 1998 ======================================================

1. Surendra Kumar, son of Shri Sheo Prasad, resident of village- Pradhana, P.O. Kabar, Police Station- Konch, District- Gaya.

2. Bharat Prasad Alok, son of Sri Chandra Sekhar Prasad, resident of village-Panti, Police Station- Fatehpur, District-Gaya.

3. Suman Traders through its proprietor Kailash Prasad Singh, son of Sri Punit Yadav, resident of village-Deori Dumari, Police StationBarachatti, District-Gaya

4. Shailesh Kumar, son of late Ram Chandra Choudhary, Resident of village-Saidpur, police station- Khizersarai, District- Gaya

5. Rajendra Kumar Yadav, son of Sri Churan Prasad, resident of villageParaia, Police Station- Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya.

6. Lalmani Singh, son of Sri Laxmi Singh, resident of village-Mocharim, Police Station-Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya

7. Dilip Traders through Shanti Devi , wife of Sri Raghu Yadav, Resident of village-Barahmoria, Police Station, Dobhi, district- Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Gaya

3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Gaya

4. The District Supply Officer, Gaya

5. The District Manager, F.C.I., Gaya .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sandip Singh, A.C. to G.P.-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-02-2015 This matter relates to cancellation of license of the levy sugar vide order dated 11.09.1997.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3655 of 1998 (6) dt.16-02-2015 As both the parties submit that on account of lapse of time, the present application has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition has been dismissed as infructuous.

(Shivaji Pandey, J.) Vats/- U