Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1959 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -168 Year- 2015 Thana -BIHARIGANJ District- MADHEPURA ======================================================
1. Pappu Yadav Son of Sanandi Yadav, Resident of Shishba, P.S.- Barhara Kothi, District- Purnia .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 14-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 168 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 435 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, the petitioner assaulted Jai Krishna Mehta with spade on his head.
Submission is of false implication and that there is case and counter case, both sides have received injuries, injuries found on the person of Jai Krishna Mehta, are simple in nature and, as such, the petitioner who is suffering in custody since 18.08.2015, deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned A.P.P.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1959 of 2016 (3) dt.14-03-2016 2/2 opposes.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Udakishunganj in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 168 of 2015 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T