Sufaida Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31627 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2016 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
Sufaida Khatoon, Wife of Md. Haroon, Resident of Village-Suhai, P.S.- Dumra, District-Sitamarhi.
2.
Jabisa Khatoon, Wife of Md. Azamat, Resident of Village-Suhai, P.S.- Dumra, District-Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. N.K. Aggrawal, Advocate Mr. Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari, Advocate Miss. Preeti Kanwar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Akbar Ali, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakurm, Advocate Mr. Subodh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Runisaidpur P.S. Case No. 122 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 302, 201, 34 of IPC. As per F.I.R. there is allegation that the husband of the informant was found trace-less and thereafter, his dead body was found in the pond. There is a suspicion against petitioners and other accused persons.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that except suspicion there is nothing against the petitioners and they are ladies.
Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31627 of 2019(3) dt.24-07-2019 2/2 appearing on behalf of the informant also, they have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that there are materials available on record, which shows that there is strong suspicion against the petitioners. Moreover, process under Sections 82 & 83 has already been exhausted.
Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, however, they may surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below on its own merit, without being prejudiced by order of this Court, and if possible, to be disposed of on the same day. With the aforesaid, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T