← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36615/2025bail granted

Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-25Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36615 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2024 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Sonu Kumar Son of Rajnandan Yadav Resident Of Village- Bharthua, Ps -Kako, Dist- Jehanabad ...

...

Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Pinki Kumari Daughter of Sunil Prasad Resident Of Village- TikuliyaPur, Ps -Kako, Dist- Jehanabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nityanand Neeraj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for O.P. No. 2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 153 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 498(A), 504, 379, 386/34 of the IPC and Sections 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.

3. It is a case of matrimonial dispute.

4. Vide order dated 10.09.2025, the matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The report of the learned Mediator shows that the matter could not be resolved between the parties and therefore, the mediation failed.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36615 of 2025(4) dt.25-11-2025 2/2 pay Rs. 4000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2.

6. On the other hand, the learned counsel for O.P. No. 2 has opposed the prayer for bail.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, especially the fact that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 4,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Jehanabad in connection with Complaint Case No. 153 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

8. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 4,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2 (the complainant). The interim maintenance will be subject to any other order granted by any other Court of competent jurisdiction granting maintenance to Opposite Party No. 2 (the complainant).

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T