← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/977/2018disposed

Kumari Poonam v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-05-02Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.977 of 2018 =========================================================== Kumari Poonam, Wife of Sri Amit Kumar Pandey, Resident of Village and P.O. Dumariya Ghat, P.S. Dumariya Ghat, District-East Champaran at Motihari, Presently Working as Panchayat Teacher in Up-graded Middle School, Semwapur, Block-Keshariya, District-East Champaran at Motihari. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of BIhar, New Secretariat, Patna

3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

4. The District Education Officer, East Champaran at Motihari, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

5. The District Programme Officer, (Establishment) East Champaran at Motihari, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

6. The Block Education Officer, Keshariya, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Semwapur, Block-Keshariya, District, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Semwapur, Block- Keshariya, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

9. The District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, East Champaran at Motihari through the Presiding Officer, District-East Champaran at Motihari. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Anita Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar, AC to GP-20 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. The petitioner is aggrieved by non-implementation of the decision of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, East Champaran, Motihari.

The decision of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, East Champaran, Motihari is meant for implementation and the respondents have no business to sit in appeal

Patna High Court CWJC No.977 of 2018 dt.02-05-2018 2/2 against the decision of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority. They have the option either to gracefully implement the decision of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority in its letter and spirit or to assail the same before the appropriate forum/Court, but in no case they can sit in appeal and defy the decision and direction passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority.

Under the aforesaid background, the Court directs the respondents to implement the decision of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority passed in Appeal Case No. 992 of 2016 in its letter and spirit and grant all consequential benefit to the petitioner within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date05.05.2018 Transmission Date