Sindhu Kumari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7186 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Sindhu Kumari and Ors W/o Arbind Singh, At-Nandlal Patti, P.O.-Sultanpur, P.S.-Amarpur, Dist.-Banka.

2.

Buchai Ravidas Son of Saryug Ravidas, Village Post-Mirahatti, P.S.- Sultanganj, District-BHagalpur.

3.

Krishn Kant Son of BIndeshwari Pd. Singh, At-Mohanpur, P.O.-Govrain, P.S.-Sajour, Dist.-Bhagalpur.

4.

Pradeep Kumar Son of Luran Rajak, At-Madhodin P.O.-Madhodih, P.S. Tarapu, Dist.-Munger.

5.

Md. Abdul Jabbar Ahmad Son of Zahir Ahmad Ansari At-Khawaja Nagar Puraini, P.S. Jagdishpur, Bhagalpur.

6.

Sanjeet Kumar Son of Mahendra Pd. Sah, At-Nurpur, P.S.-Nathnagar, Dist.- Bhagalpur.

7.

Rajesh Kumar Son of Rajendra Sah, At-Munshi Banshi Badan len, P.S. Nathnagar, Dist.-Bhagalpur.

8.

Rakesh Kumar Pandey Son of Ram Pravesh Pandey, At+P.O.-Baliya, P.S.- Saran, Dist.-Chapra (Saran).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department Government of BIhar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Director, Mass Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

District Magistrate, Bhagalpur.

6.

District Mass Education Officer, Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhirendra Nath Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.C. Mishra-Sc16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 20-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits

Patna High Court CWJC No.7186 of 2018(3) dt.20-03-2024 2/2 that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous on account of judgment dated 05.07.2023 rendered by Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Civil Review No.59 of 2018 (The State of Bihar & Ors. Vs. Harendra Mishra & Ors.). and the same may be disposed off accordingly. The operative portion of the said judgment is extracted as under:- "As has been discussed above, as the writ petitioners had admittedly not approached this Court or the Supreme Court on or before 26.02.2016, no relief could have been granted to them. The writ petition filed by them, i.e., CWJC No. 384 of 2017, deserved to be dismissed. Accordingly, we set aside the order dated 03.03.2017 passed in CWJC No. 384 of 2017."

3. In this view of the matter, the present writ petition is hereby disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Sunnykr/- U