Ravindra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32880 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2019 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Ravindra Yadav Son of Rajendra Yadav Resident of Village - Surju Bigha, P.S.- Khizersarai, Distt.- Gaya.
2.
Madho Yadav Son of Vishundeo Yadav Resident of Village - Surju Bigha, P.S.- Khizersarai, Distt.- Gaya.
... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Dr. Mritunjay Kumar Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-12-2020 Heard Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh learned senior counsel for the petitioners and Dr. Mritunjay Kumar Gautam, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2.
The petitioners seek bail in connection with Khizersarai P.S. Case No. 231 of 2019 initially registered for the offences punishable under Sections 308, 341, 323, 325/34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added.
3.
Considering that for the alleged offence which took place on 03.08.2019, the first information report was registered on 10.08.2019 and the fact that though altogether nine named accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant
2/3 Pinki Devi, who subsequently in course of treatment succumbed, the doctor, who conducted the post-mortem examination, could notice only two ante-mortem external injuries on her person, noticing which, the similarly circumstanced co-accused Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Yadav has been granted bail by another Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.02.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11791 of 2020, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-4th, Gaya in connection with Khizersarai P.S. Case No. 231 of 2019. 4.
Since the court proceedings are being conducted through virtual mode and normal court functioning has not been restored till date, it is considered appropriate to adopt the following procedure for communication of the present order:- (i) The order, which has been dictated during the course of proceeding of the virtual court, shall be communicated to me on my e-mail by the Sr.
Secretary.
(ii) The corrected copy of the order shall be transmitted by me from my e-mail id to the Sr. Secretary, which shall be treated to be an authentic copy of the order
3/3 passed by this Court in the present proceeding. (iii) Hard copy of the order duly signed by me shall be preserved in my residential office for documentation and future use, if any.
(iv) Let steps be taken by the Sr. Secretary/registry for up- loading of the present order without compromising with the norms of social distancing.
rohit/- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) U T