Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34200/2022bail rejected

Sarun Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2022-10-20Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34200 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2022 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

SARUN SAH S/o Jay Lal Sah Resident of Village- Mirjapur, P.S.- Madhaura, District- Saran at Chapra 2.

Arun Kumar Sah @ Arun Sah S/o Jay Lal Sah Resident of Village- Mirjapur, P.S.- Madhaura, District- Saran at Chapra 3.

Manish Kumar Sah @ Manish Kumar S/o Nagendra Sah Resident of Village- Mirjapur, P.S.- Madhaura, District- Saran at Chapra 4.

Thakur Kumar Manjhi @ Jitendra Manjhi S/o Sugreev Manjhi Resident of Village- Mirjapur, P.S.- Madhaura, District- Saran at Chapra 5.

Ajit Manjhi S/o Balmiki Manjhi Resident of Village- Mirjapur, P.S.- Madhaura, District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 307, 324, 379 and some other ancillary Sections of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, all the FIR named accused persons, including these petitioners, abused and assaulted the informant, his nephew and cousin as a result of which they sustained injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34200 of 2022(2) dt.20-10-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case. It is further submitted that there was simple Mar-pit on account of petty dispute. Allegation of assault with Chanuata is against petitioner No.2. Petitioners have got clean antecedent. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that petitioners are named in the FIR and as a result of assault committed by the petitioners three persons sustained injuries and injuries of injured Bablu Kumar have found to be grievous in nature. Considering the nature of accusation, gravity of the offence and nature of injuries, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T