Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38136/2024bail granted

Birenrdra Kumar @ Dhirendra @ Dhirendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-01Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38136 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2024 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Birenrdra Kumar @ Dhirendra @ Dhirendra Kumar son of Surendra Prasad @ Shiv Kumar Prasad Village- Kurmama Ps- Cherki Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bodhgaya (Cherki) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2024 dated 18.02.2024 registered for the offence/s punishable u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471, 489(C), 489(D) and 489 (E) read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, on secret informant, police apprehended the petitioner and on search a total amount of Rs. 3,80,000/- of fake notes was recovered from his house. It is further alleged that police also recovered fake note printing machine, notes and stamps from the house of the co-accused Anuj Kumar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38136 of 2024(4) dt.01-10-2024 2/2 the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the said recovery. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 19.02.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gaya in connection with Bodhgaya (Cherki) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2024, with the following condition/s:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T