Ranjan Kumar Sah And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49747 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -121 Year- 2014 Thana -GOVINDGANJ DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Ranjan Kumar Sah, S/o Motor Sah, resident of village- Raj pur Pokhar
2. Raju @ Radha Krishan Sah S/o Dhurendra Sah, resident of village Mishirgram, Bariaria, Both P.S. of Sangrampur, Distt - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar, Addl.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-03-2015 Heard.
The petitioners seek bail in a criminal prosecution registered under Sections 420, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners are stated to be in judicial custody since 19.07.2014 and it is claimed that no other criminal case is pending against the petitioners except the present one, their prayer for bail is allowed. The petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Sadar at Motihari in connection with Govindganj P.S.Case No.121 of 2014, subject to the conditions that:
(a) Only parents of both the petitioners shall be bailor, (b) if the petitioners are found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of bail of the petitioners, and if such a
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49747 of 2014 (2) dt.03-03-2015 petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned;
(c) the petitioners shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing themselves in person or through representation by their lawyer on each and every date, and if on two consecutive dates petitioners fail to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Arvind/- U T