Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51587 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -120 Year- 2014 Thana -PATRAKARNAGAR District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Rahul Kumar S/o Sri Satendra Ravidas R/v - Railway Colony, Guljarbagh, South of Railway Station, P.S. Bypass, Distt. - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Nath Mishra(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No. 120 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. According to the prosecution case, the petitioner was apprehended by the police while he was moving on a stolen motorcycle and from his possession a stolen lap-top was also recovered. It would appear from the record that the petitioner is accused in at least two other cases of offences relating to theft of property.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case and in the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51587 of 2014 (2) dt.03-03-2015 2/2 other two cases, petitioner has already been granted bail. Be that as it may, regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected.
As the petitioner is in custody since 2nd June, 2014, I direct the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Patna to proceed with the trial of the case on day to day basis and conclude the same as early as possible preferably within nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order, failing which the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Pradeep/- U T