← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/993/2023disposed

Umesh Ram v. The State Of Bihar Through Director General Of Police, Sardar Patel Bhawan, Bailey Road,

2023-12-05Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.993 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2023 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== UMESH RAM Son of Narayan Ram Resident of Village - Bahbal Bajar, P.S.- Minapur, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Director General of Police, Sardar Patel Bhawan, Bailey Road, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, Dist.- Patna. 2.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur. Bihar 3.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Muzaffarpur. Bihar 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur. Bihar 5.

The Station House Officer, Minapur Police Station, Muzaffarpur Bihar ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shanti Bhushan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, AC to AAG-III ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 05-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Petitioner in the present case has prayed for following reliefs:

(i) For direction to the respondents to complete the investigation and submit charge-sheet against the accused persons in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 69 of 2023.

(ii) For direction to the respondents to arrest the accused persons in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 69 of 2023.

(iii) For any other relief/relieves which is entitled to the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.993 of 2023(3) dt.05-12-2023 2/2

3. Having regard to the statements made in paragraph '4' and '9' of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed as the police has investigated the case and found that the named accused persons have not committed the occurrence in original sections of the F.I.R. The case has been found true against non-F.I.R. accused.

4. In the aforesaid view of the matter, this writ application has become infructuous and is being disposed of accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rishi/- U T