← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39715/2024allowed

Jitu Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-30Mr. Justice Harish Kumar3 pages

TIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39715 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-532 Year-2023 Thana- BIHAR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Jitu Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Son of Navratan Prasad R/O Vill- Patuana, P.s.- Bihar, Dist.- Nalanda, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-05-2024 Heard Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 532 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.

3. Allegedly while the accused persons were involved in demolishing the hut of the informant through JCB machine; the same was protested, whereupon co-accused Md. Shakil and others started assaulting and abusing her. It is further, alleged that on the exhortation made by co-accused Md. Shakil, the petitioner and one Mukesh have made an indiscriminate firing.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39715 of 2024(2) dt.30-05-2024 2/3 petitioner contended that although general allegation of firing has been levelled against the petitioner and co-accused Mukesh, however, no one has sustained any injury. Moreover, the present case has been instituted on the premise of a land dispute. There is a counter version of the present case being Bihar P.S. Case No. 533 of 2023 instituted by the wife of Md. Shakil. In order to support the contention of land dispute learned advocate for the petitioner further contended that with respect to the land in question, a proceeding under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure vide Case No. 1535(M) of 2022 has also initiated by SDM, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda. Now the final order in the aforesaid case has been passed in favour of Md. Shakil. It is lastly contended that the petitioner has absolutely clean antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the investigation or in the proceeding of the Court.

5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the pre-arrest bail application.

6. Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the nature of allegation and the fact that none has sustained any injury coupled with the factum of case and counter case on the premise of land dispute, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39715 of 2024(2) dt.30-05-2024 3/3 of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, Bihar Sharif in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 532 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (Harish Kumar, J) supratim/- U T