Amrendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3387 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -152 Year- 2010 Thana -BIHARIGANJ District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Amrendra Yadav Son of Sri Kishore Yadav Resident of Village- Beltari, P.S. Janki Nagar, District-Purnea.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bachan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 16-03-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 152 of 2010 registered for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
First Information Report is against three miscreants. As submitted the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused Mantu Yadav. Mantu Yadav has already been allowed bail by learned court below itself vide B.P. No. 300 of 2011, the petitioner has not been put on T.I.P. though, he is suffering in custody since 23.12.2015, nothing has been recovered from his possession, to which the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3387 of 2016 (3) dt.16-03-2016 2/2 learned APP does not controvert.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Uda- Kishunganj, Madhepura in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 152 of 2010, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) ajaypd./- U T