Jamil Akhtar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33744 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2025 Thana- Bijdhari District- East Champaran ====================================================== Jamil Akhtar S/o Mohammad Shakil Resident of Village- Rampur Korar, P.S.- Bijdhari, Post- Kesharia, Dist.- East Champaran, Bihar- 843112 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Amit, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No.1, APP For the Informant : Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 11-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the informant and his son with knife due to which they sustained injuries on head and neck.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the present case arises out of a land dispute and there is case from both the sides, rather the case lodged by the petitioner's side is earlier in point of time. It is further submitted that both the parties are close neighbours and petitioner's wife also sustained vital injury on her head. There is allegation of assault by means of knife against the petitioner but the fact of the matter is that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33744 of 2026(3) dt.11-06-2026 2/2 injury report of Irshadul Haque indicates seven injuries in the nature of two lacerated wounds while others are in the nature of complain of pain and dog-bite but all the injuries are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. The petitioner has been languishing in custody since 02.04.2026 and the charge-sheet has been submitted on 24.04.2026.

5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail petition on the ground that there is specific allegation of assault upon the petitioner.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the case arises out of a land dispute, there is case and counter case and both sides sustained injuries coupled with the fact that the injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bijdhari P.S. Case No.44 of 2025.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) Trivedi/- U T