Manjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar , Thrugh P.K. Thakur. D.G.P.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.900 of 2017 In Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.530 of 2016 ====================================================== Manjeet Kumar S/o Sri Arjun Rai, aged about 25 years Resident of VillageMohuddinpur, P.S. Bidupur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar , Thrugh P.K. Thakur. DGP, Bihar Government, Patna. 2.

Sri. P.K. Thakur, the Director General of Police, Bihar,Patna. 3.

Sri Sunil Kumae, the Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4.

Sri Asgar Imam, the Police, D.I.G. , Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 5.

Sri Rakesh Kumar, the Superintendent of Police, Vaishali at Hajipur. 6.

Sri. Rashid Jama, the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Hajipur, Vaishali. 7.

Sri Lalan Chaudhary, the Officer-in-Charge, Bidupur, P.S. Vaishali. 8.

Rajendra Singh S/o late Doman Singh 9.

Arun Kumar 10.

Sanjay Kumar, Both 9 and 10 sons of Rajendra Singh 11.

Ravi Shankar Singh S/o Banke Singh 12.

Rohit Kumar 13.

Vikash Kumar 14.

Sushil Kumar All 12 to 14 are sons of Ravi Shankar Singh 15.

Bhagwat Rai S/o late Jagdarlal Rai 16.

Lal Babu Rai 17.

Arvind Rai Both 16 and 17 sons of Bhagwat Rai All Resident of Village Mohiuddinpur, P.S. - Bidupur, District- Vaishali. 18.

Elder brother in-law of Sanjay KumarPetitioner No. 10 Resident of VillageEjra, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. 19.

Shashi Rai S/o late Kapildeo Rai Resident of Village- Karnpura, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Prakash Sinha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suman Kumar Jha- AC to AAG 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 18-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

Patna High Court MJC No.900 of 2017 dt.18-04-2019 2/2

2. The present petition has been filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for willful disobedience of the judgment of this Court dated 04.07.2016 passed in Cr. W.J.C. No. 530 of 2016.

3. A show cause has been filed on behalf of OP No. 5, inter alia, stating in para 13 thereof that of the 19 accused persons, charge sheet no. 136/2015 dated 20.06.2015 has been submitted against five accused persons while 12 accused persons have been found not to be involved in the occurrence. One FIR named accused Shashi Ray has died and one non-FIR accused Vishwanath Bhagat is absconding and for which direction has already been given for attachment of his property.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner appears and has been heard. However, no rejoinder has been filed controverting the stand of the opposite party no. 5.

5. In the above circumstances, this Court is satisfied that the order of the writ Court stands complied with substantially.

6. MJC No. 900 of 2017 stands disposed of .

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 20.04.2019 Transmission Date NA