Umesh Prasad Chaurasiya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37090 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2023 Thana- SRINAGAR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Umesh Prasad Chaurasiya SON OF Yadolal Bhagat VILLAGEBHAWANIPUR, BARAI TOLA, PS- SRINAGAR, DIST- WEST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

SANGEETA KUMARI @ SANGEETA DEVI WIFE OF SRI UMESH PRASAD CHAURASIYA VILLAGE- AWARAIYA, BARAI TOLA, PSBANUCHHAPAR, DIST- WEST CHAMPARAN ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharad Kumar Verma, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP.

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 307, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. Petitioner, who is husband of informant, is said to have tortured upon her physically and mentally and ousted her from the matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37090 of 2024(2) dt.26-06-2024 2/3 that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has committed no offence. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. He has neither made any dowry demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. It is further submitted that the petitioner did not succeed in his sincere efforts to bring the informant back and filed divorce case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para 3 of the bail application.

5. In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Srinagar P.S. Case No. 105 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. Petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 3,000.00 (Rupees Three Thousand) per month to the informant in the second week of every month. If the petitioner fails to pay the aforesaid amount on two consecutive months, informant shall be at liberty to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37090 of 2024(2) dt.26-06-2024 3/3 move before the learned Court below for cancelling the bail bond of the petitioner.

7. It goes without saying that the aforesaid payment shall be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial maintenance case or any other collateral proceedings.

8. Learned Court for the informant is directed to furnish the bank account details of the informant. If she fails to furnish the same, the aforesaid amount will be deposited in the learned Court below which will be released in favour of the informant after she furnishes her bank account details.

9. If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

10. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T