Niraj Kumar Yadav @ Niraj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.284 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -80 Year- 2013 Thana -SANHOLA District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================
1. Niraj Kumar Yadav @ Niraj Yadav Son of Jai Prakash Yadav resident of village - Barari, P.S. - Industrial Area, District - Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 10-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302, 201/34 later on added section 396 of the Indian Penal Code. The first information report was lodged against unknown. The name of the petitioner appears in the confessional statement of Pashupati Kumar Yadav and others. Pashupati Kumar Yadav has been granted bail vide Cri. Misc. No. 33700 of 2014 and the petitioner has remained in custody since 02.04.2014.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.284 of 2015 (3) dt.10-03-2015 2/2 sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District Judge-II, Bhagalpur in Sessions Trial No. 271 of 2014 corresponding to Sanhaula P.S. Case No. 80 of 2013, subject to the following conditions:
1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.
2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offences.
3. The petitioner will be well represented in the court.
4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.
(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) M.Rahman/- U T