Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4458/2016rejected

Vijay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-03-31Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4458 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -692 Year- 2014 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Vijay Singh son of Shivjee Singh resident of vill.- Parwa, P.S.- Nokha, Dist.- Rohtas presently residing at Mohalla- Gajrarh (Gourakshani), P.S.- Sasaram (M), Dist- Rohtas at Sasaram .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anita Kumari (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 31-03-2016 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Let it be kept on the record. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 23.04.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10988 of 2015 which was disposed of with Cr. Misc. No. 8338 of 2015 on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 15.09.2014 and only up till now the case has been committed to the court of Sessions resulting in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration, to which the learned A.P.P. opposes.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4458 of 2016 (3) dt.31-03-2016 2/2 In the facts and circumstances as stated above, at present finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail, again prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with S. Tr. No. 38 of 2015 arising out of Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 692 of 2014 pending in the court of 5th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Rohtas, Sasaram.

However, considering detention of the petitioner, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and to conclude the same preferably within six months after keeping the same on day to day basis, failing which the petitioner may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T