← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9085/2022dismissed

Upendra Narayan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-22Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9085 of 2022 ====================================================== Upendra Narayan Singh Son of Late Mahavir Singh, Resident of VillageKhanpur, P.S.-Derani, District-Saran at present resident of Kaushal Colony, A.N. Singh Road, Doranda, Ranchi (Jharkhand). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Home Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Special Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The District Magistrate, Saran.

6.

The Superintendent of Police, Saran.

7.

The District Armed Magistrate, Saran.

8.

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer-cum-Additional Superintendent of Police, Sonepur.

9.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sonepur, Saran.

10.

The Circle Officer, Dariyapur, Saran.

11.

The Officer-in-Charge Derani Police Station, Saran. 12.

Karunesh Kumar Singh @ Guddu Singh, son of Late Birendra Singh, Resident of Village Khanpur, P.S. Derani, District-Saran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar,Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar,GP-4 Mr.Manoj Kumar,AC to GP-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 22-03-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, direction/directions, directing the Respondent to cancel/withdraw the license bearing license No. 6 of 2017 of

Patna High Court CWJC No.9085 of 2022(2) dt.22-03-2023 2/2 Rifle bearing Rifle No.91-AB, 0236 issued by Respondent No. 7 to Respondent No.

12 in a very illegal and erroneous manner even without following rules and norms of law and even without considering criminal antecedent of Respondent No. 12."

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies, as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/sonalU