Chintu Kumar Singh @ Chintu Kumar @ Chintu Singh @ Sintu Kumar @ Sintu Singh @ Amit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11320 of 2015 (5) dt.29-07-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11320 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -26 Year- 2013 Thana -RAGHOPUR District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Chintu Kumar Singh @ Chintu Kumar @ Chintu Singh @ Sintu Kumar @ Sintu Singh @ Amit Singh S/o Sri Bhushan Singh Resident of Village Hanuman Nagar, P.S. Supaul, District Supaul.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 29-07-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 26 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Section 376 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. Prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected vide order dated 10.02.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42837 of 2013. The petitioner may renew his bail before the learned court below after examination of the victim in trial but the victim has not been examined as yet. The case is pending before the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Supaul.

Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11320 of 2015 (5) dt.29-07-2015 the petitioner is rejected.

However, learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Supaul is directed to conclude the trial within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. The S.P., Supaul is also directed to ensure the presence of all the witnesses during the course of Sessions Trial No. 191 of 2014 arising out of Raghopur P. S. Case No. 26 of 2013. If the trial is not concluded within a period of six months, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Jagdish/- U T