← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14703/2015bail granted

Abdul Rahman v. The State Of Bihar

2015-05-28Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14703 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -131 Year- 2014 Thana -DIGHALBANK District- KISANGANJ ====================================================== Abdul Rahman S/o- Noor Mohammad, resident of village- Dhaturi Gherma Bari, P.S.- Palasi, District- Araria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J.N.Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER -------------- 28-05-2015 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in a criminal prosecution registered under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Though the petitioner is named in the first information report vide Annexure-1 as an accused and was allegedly caught on the spot while committing theft but taking into consideration the fact that he is in judicial custody since 01.10.2014 and he is said to be the first offender, his prayer for bail is allowed. The above named petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in Dighal Bank P.S.Case No. 131 of 2014, subject to the following conditions:

(A) one of the bailors must be a government servant or a close family member or a close relation of the petitioner who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner, (B) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14703 of 2015 (2) dt.28-01-2015 2/2 the informant/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned, and (C) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Tahir/- U T