Vishal Raj @ Rinku Patel v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32250 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-175 Year-2020 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR TOWN DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Vishal Raj @ Rinku Patel, Son of Pappu Patel, Resident of Mohalla - New Colony Balughat, Dip Nagar, Ward No.- 16, Town, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Shekhar Anand, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-03-2021 As prayed for, let the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within four weeks of starting of the Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Muzaffarpur Town (Sikandarpur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 175 of 2020, registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, 2016, pending in the court of Special Judge, Excise Act, Muzaffarpur.

The accusation is of recovery of 10 bottles each containing 750 ml, 15 bottles each containing 375 ml and 6

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32250 of 2020(2) dt.08-03-2021 2/2 bottles each containing 180 ml Indian made foreign liquor from the room of the first floor of the house of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits petitioner was not apprehended at the spot rather it is alleged that the bottles of Indian made foreign liquor are said to be recovered from the room of the first floor of the house of the petitioner. Further submission is that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T