Sabir Miyan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5009 of 2017 ====================================================== Sabir Miyan S/o - Khalil Miyan resident of village - Gamhariya Veer Nagar, P.O. - Sugaha Bhawanipur, P.S.- Kangali, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
The Land Reforms Dy. Collector, Narkatiyaganj, West Champaran. 3.
The Circle Officer, Sikta, West Champaran.
4.
Shafique Miyan S/o Late Isha Miyan 5.
Abbas Miya 6.
Mohammad Alam Respondent No. 5 & 6 are sons of Late Amar Miya Respondents No. 4 to 6 are residents of village - Gamhariya Veer Nagar, P.O. - Sugahan Bhawanipur, P.S. - Kangali, District - West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sajid Salim Khan -Sc25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 01-09-2025 None appears for the petitioner. Though State is present.
2. This application has been filed for the following reliefs:
"To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 02.11.2015 (Annexure P/3) passed in B. L. T. Case No. 1176 of 2015, by which the learned Member, Administrative directed the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy of appeal in view of the Bihar Land Dispute Resolution Act, 2009 and further for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for
Patna High Court CWJC No.5009 of 2017(3) dt.01-09-2025 2/3 quashing of the order dated 06.09.2013 (Annexure P/1) passed by the Respondent No. 2 in connection with Case No. 69 of 2013-14.
II. To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the orders dated 02.11.2015 (Annexure - P/3) passed in B. L. T. Case No. 1176 of 2015 & 06.09.2013 (Annexure P/1) passed by the Respondent No. 2 in connection with Case No. 69 of 2013-14, as it transpires that the Respondent No. 2, instead of adjudicating the issue passed the order by observing "
उभयपकोको सुननेएवंदाखखलकागजातोके अवलोकनपरांतयह नयायालयइसखनषकरपरपहुँचताहैखकआवेदकदारा खेसरानं0 - 871 कीबंटवाराहेतुयहवादलायागयाहै जबखकखवपकीदाराखेसरानं०871 केअखतखरकतखेसरा नं०912 सखममखलतरपमेहोनेकीचचारकीगईहै।साथ हींखववादीखेसरेकीभूखमकईटूकडोमेखवखभनन बैयनामादसतावेजोकेजखरएखबकीखकएजानेकीबाद उललेखखतकीगईहै।आवेदकदारासभीखखतयानी खेसरोकीभूखमपरयहवादनलाकरकेवलएकखेसरेके भूखमकेबंटवारेहेतुयहवादलायागयाहैजोत्रखटपूर है।साथहींकईटूकडोमेखववादीखेसरेकीभूखम खनबंखधतदसतावेजोदाराखवखभननलोगोकोखबकीखकए जानेकेकाररसवतवकासंखशलषटप्रशनसखननखहतहोने कातथयपखरलखकतहोतोहै।इसप्रकारइसवादका खनपटारासकमनयायालयमे संभवहै।सवतवका संखशलषटप्रशनसखननखहतहोनेकेकाररइसवादकी कायरवाहीसमापतकीजातीहै।". But, the Member, Administrative of B.L.T remanded the case, granting leave to the petitioner to ventilate his
Patna High Court CWJC No.5009 of 2017(3) dt.01-09-2025 3/3 grievances before the Divisional Commissioner by dismissing the B.L.T. Case No. 1176 of 2015."
3. This case is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Rajiv Roy, J) Saif/- U T