Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32827/2026bail rejected

Omprakash Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32827 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2025 Thana- BISHANPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Omprakash Singh S/o Ram Singhasan Singh R/o vill - Gorhiyari, P.S.- Bishanpur, Distt.- Darbhanga 2.

Rajneesh Kumar Singh @ Aman Kumar S/o Ratneshwar Singh R/o vill - Gorhiyari, P.S.- Bishanpur, Distt.- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Y. V. Giri, Sr. Advocate Ms. Shrishti Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Jagnnath Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-07-2026 Heard Mr. Y.V. Giri, learned senior counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned A.P.P. for the State and Mr. Jagnnath Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and subsequently, Section 103(1) of B.N.S. was added.

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all 6 F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted father of informant, namely Subh Narayan Singh, with iron rod, butt of pistol and lathi as a result of which, he died

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32827 of 2026(3) dt.21-07-2026 2/2 during course of treatment. Petitioner No. 1 has got five criminal antecedents and Petitioner No. 2 has got two criminal antecedents.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation, fact that petitioners are assailant of the deceased and their criminal antecedents, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners is rejected.

5. However, considering the fact that petitioners are in custody since 18.02.2026, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same, preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T