Anmol Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.545 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -115 Year- 2014 Thana -TRIVENIGANJ District- SUPAUL ======================================================
1. Anmol Yadav Son of Sheo Narayan Yadav Resident of VillagePratappur,Tola-Baija,P.S-Tribeniganj,District-Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr.Sharma(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 10-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner State and the informant.
The petitioner seeks bail in Tribeniganj P.S. Case No. 115 of 2014 for the offence punishable under sections 364, 323, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioner and others is to have abducted Sudesh Kumar Yadav, the brother of the complainant-informant. It is submitted that the date of occurrence is 12.05.2014, whereas, the complaint case has been filed on 28.05.2014 by Umesh Yadav, the brother of the alleged victim Sudesh Kumar Yadav. As a matter of fact the alleged victim Sudesh Yadav had love affairs with Mamta Kumari daughter of Pritanand Yadav and he married on 12.05.2014. When the marriage was not accepted by the complainant and his father
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.545 of 2015 (3) dt.10-03-2015 2/2 thereafter this case has been lodged. The marriage certificate issued by the Bhimshankar Temple Management Development Committee has been filed as annexure-2.
Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer but could not controvert the contention of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Mukesh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate Supaul in Tribeniganj P.S. Case No. 115 of 2014 with the following conditions:
1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.
2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.
3. The petitioner will be well represented in the court.
4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates, or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.
(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) M.Rahman/- U T