← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10196/2019disposed

Broad Son Commodities Pvt. Ltd. v. The Department Of Mines

2025-06-24Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10196 of 2019 ====================================================== Broad Son Commodities Pvt. Ltd. a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Dr. Himanshu Complex, Block Road, Koilwar Cowk, P.S.-Koilwar, District-Ara (Bhojpur), through its Director Punj Kumar Singh, aged about 52 years male, Son of Ram Ballabh Prasad Singh, Resident of Near Suraksha Clinic, Hetli Band, Jharia, Amtal, Amtal, Dhanbad, Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Department of Mines through Mines Commissioner, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 2.

The Assistant Director Mines and Geology Department, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 3.

The Licensing Authority cum Collector Bhojpur 4.

The Mines Inspector District Mines Officer, Bhojpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suraj Samdarshi, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA-7 For the Mines :

Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-06-2025 Heard the parties.

2. With the consent of both the parties, this writ application is being disposed of at the present stage itself.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Suraj Samdarshi submits that for the reliefs claimed for in the present writ application, the petitioner has filed a representation before the Licensing Authority-cum-Collector, Bhojpur (respondent no.3) which is enclosed at Annexure-15 dated 04.04.2019, which has till date not been disposed of on merit.

Patna High Court CWJC No.10196 of 2019(4) dt.24-06-2025 2/2

4. The counsel for the petitioner, therefore, submits that he would be satisfied, if any appropriate direction could be given to the Licensing Authority-cum-Collector, Bhojpur (respondent no.3) to hear the petitioner and dispose of his representation on merit by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated time frame.

5. This prayer being made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the respondents.

6. Considering the limited nature of prayer being made by learned counsel for the petitioner this case is disposed of directing the Licensing Authority-cum-Collector, Bhojpur (respondent no.3) to dispose of the representation (Annexure15) filed by the petitioner on merit after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, within two months from the date of production of a copy of this order by the petitioner.

7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ application is disposed of.

8. All pending I.A.s, if any, stands disposed of. (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Prakash Narayan U