Sagari Yadav @ Sagar Yadav @ Sagari Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34338 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2024 Thana- Mufassil District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.

Sagari Yadav @ Sagar Yadav @ Sagari Yadav S/O Anik Yadav R/O Morkahi, P.s.- Khagaria Mufassil, Dist.- Khagaria. 2.

Pappu Yadav S/O Sagari Yadav R/O Morkahi, P.s.- Khagaria Mufassil, Dist.- Khagaria.

3.

Mohan Yadav @ Manish Kumar S/O Vico Yadav R/O Morkahi, P.s.- Khagaria Mufassil, Dist.- Khagaria.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Mirtunjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners, apprehending their arrest, in connection with Khagaria Muffasil PS. Case No-169 of 2024 Dated-02.12.2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 111, 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 308(5), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 & 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case as emerging from the FIR is that the Petitioner along with the co-accused came to the land of the Informant and prohibited him from ploughing without

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34338 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2025 2/3 paying rangdari of Rs.50,000/-. As per the further case, firing was also done there. However, there is no allegation of anybody getting injured.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the Petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as a matter of fact, the land is the Khatiyani land of the Petitioner and fraudulently they have claimed the land. He also submits that there is no truth in the allegation.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioners have not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioners have been made accused in one other case in which they are on bail.

7. learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioners above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on their

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34338 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2025 3/3 furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court Below, in connection with Khagaria Muffasil PS. Case No-169 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and on the following conditions:

(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioners have any criminal antecedents other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners after hearing them and getting satisfied that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents despite their knowledge of the same.

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(Jitendra Kumar, J.) Chandan/- U T