Shahbaz Alam @ Shabaj Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39389 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -26 Year- 2010 Thana -THAKURGANJ District- KISANGANJ ====================================================== Shahbaz Alam @ Shabaj Alam Son of Nurul Haque, Resident of villageTatalguri , P.S.-Thakurganj , District-Kishanganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anamul Haque For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 971 of 2011 arising from Thakurganj P.S. Case No. 26 of 2010 registered for offences under sections 366(A), 376, 379, 323, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was earlier granted bail, but he has misused the privilege of bail for two years.

The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would cooperate in the early disposal of the case. In view of the statement made at the bar, let the petitioner, Shahbaz Alam @ Shabaj Alam, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39389 of 2016 (2) dt.17-09-2016 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Kishanganj in connection with S.Tr. No. 971 of 2011 arising from Thakurganj P.S. Case No. 26 of 2010, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be father/mother/wife/son of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would remain physically present before the court below on each and every date. If the petitioner would remain absent on two consecutive dates without any rhyme or reason, the court below will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T