Meghraj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.649 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -336 Year- 2013 Thana -TEKARI District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Meghraj Yadav Son of Late Sukan Yadav Resident of village - Simuara, P.S. - Tekari, District - Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Durgesh Nandan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. B.Ram(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 27-01-2015 Heard both sides.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under section 302 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.
The informant, daughter in-law of the deceased alleged that all the accused persons came and assaulted her mother-in-law.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant alleged that the petitioner Meghraj Yadav assaulted the mother-in-law of the informant with butt on her chest. But she in her further statement has made omnibus and general allegation against all the accused persons. The son of the deceased has further stated that his mother fell down and got
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.649 of 2015 (3) dt.27-01-2015 2/2 injuries resulting into her death. On perusal of the record it appears that the informant has made very specific allegation that the petitioner assaulted the mother-in-law of the informant with butt of rifle on her chest. On perusal of the postmortem report it appears that ribs of the deceased were fractured causing injury in chest and lungs. Of course other accused persons have already been enlarged on bail but since there is specific allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is rejected.
However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within nine months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the trial is not concluded within the stipulated time the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail firstly before the trial court.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) M.Rahman/- U T