Birendra Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34205 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-157 Year-2021 Thana- SIKRAUL District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.

BIRENDRA PANDEY Son of Late Kedar Pandey Residents of VillageBasmanpur, PS- Sikraul, District- Buxar 2.

Anil Pandey Son of Birendra Pandey Residents of Village- Basmanpur, PSSikraul, District- Buxar 3.

Bajrangi Pandey Son of Birendra Pandey Residents of Village- Basmanpur, PS- Sikraul, District- Buxar 4.

Devanti Devi Wife of Birendra Pandey Residents of Village- Basmanpur, PS- Sikraul, District- Buxar 5.

Rukmina Devi @ Jamwanti Wife of Anil Pandey Residents of VillageBasmanpur, PS- Sikraul, District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 26-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against these petitioners along with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34205 of 2023(2) dt.26-06-2023 2/3 another is of killing the daughter of the informant due to nonfulfillment of dowry demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. They have committed no offence. He submitted that the petitioners are in law's members of the deceased. He submitted that the petitioners have no concern with mess and business of the deceased as well as her husband. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. The husband of the deceased namely, Shashikant Pandey is languishing in judicial custody. They are languishing in judicial custody since 20.02.2023.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State, learned counsel for the informant and submitted that these petitioners have committed offence.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Buxar in connection

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34205 of 2023(2) dt.26-06-2023 3/3 with Sikraul P.S. Case No. 157 of 2021.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T