Suddu Singh @ Suddu Kumar @ Pratyaksh Tyagi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33918 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-739 Year-2025 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Suddu Singh @ Suddu Kumar @ Pratyaksh Tyagi son of Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharmendra Tyagi @ Dharmendra Resident of Belbanaa ward No 23 Town, PS -Motihari Town, Dist- Motihari (West Champaran ) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shambhu Sn Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No.739 of 2025, F.I.R dated 01.08.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, on 31.07.2025, the informant had gone to Gayatri Mandir Chowk for breakfast and was eating bhuja in the field near Nagar Bhawan when the petitioner and other accused persons allegedly attacked him. It is

2/4 alleged that accused Lucky Kumar inflicted a knife injury on the informant's forehead, while the petitioner, namely Suddu Kumar @ Suddu Singh @ Pratyaksh Tyagi, inflicted a knife blow on his head. Another accused, Mohit Kumar, allegedly wrapped a gamcha around the informant's neck. Upon hearing the commotion, passersby reached the spot and rescued the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against this petitioner of having assaulted the informant, namely, Manish Kumar, with knife is false and does not corroborate with the F.I.R. and the injuries is said to have been caused by hard and blunt substance while the injuries are found to be simple in nature. It has further been submitted that a compromise has already been filed between the parties and they do no want to proceed with the litigation. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that the injuries sustained by the informant does not corroborate the allegations levelled in the F.I.R, and the injuries are found to be simple in nature and the petitioner has no criminal

3/4 antecedent. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Session Judge - IV, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No.

4/4 failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) sharun/- U T