Kripa Shankar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44291 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2371 Year-2019 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== KRIPA SHANKAR KUMAR Son of Kishor Prasad Resident of Village - Juda Pakdi, P.S.- Ramnagar, District - West Champaran, Bettiah ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Veena Kumari Wife of Kripa Shankar Kumar D/o Dharamdeo Prasad, At Present, Resident of Village - Parsa, Post Office - Shirni Bazar, P.S.- Govindganj, District - East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saroj Kr. Sharma, Ms. Kiran Kumari Sharma, Mr. Nilesh Kr. Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. C-2371 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Sections 323, 379, 504, 498A and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. This case relates to torture and harassment to the complainant due to non-fulfillment of four wheeler as further dowry demand.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44291 of 2021(6) dt.20-07-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is husband of the complainant and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has never demanded any thing from the complainant. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to keep his wife with full honour and dignity.

Learned counsel for the informant has asserted that complainant is also ready to live with her husband. A supplementary affidavit has been filed regarding compromise between husband and wife.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No. C-2371 of 2019 he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Motihari, East Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U