Bishwajeet Kumar @ Bishwajeet Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33743 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-618 Year-2024 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai ====================================================== Bishwajeet Kumar @ Bishwajeet Das S/o Late Brahamdev Prasad @ Brahamdev Das Resident of Chakgopal @ Pokhariya Ward No. 20, Hemra Road, Near B.P. High School, Baiju Das Bhawan, P.S.- Town, DistrictBegusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shahrukh Shiddiqui For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Town P.S. Case No. 618 of 2024 initially registered under Sections 329(4), 318(4), 308(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of B.N.S. and later on, Section-109(1) and 132 of the B.N.S. was also added.

3. According to allegation, the petitioner alongwith other co-accused persons after entering into premises of the informant, started creating chaos. He abused the informant and attempted to evict him from his premises. He dismantled the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33743 of 2025(3) dt.09-10-2025 2/3 boundary wall of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He submitted that it is true that some portion of the land, in dispute, was sold by grandmother of the petitioner but a little portion of that land was remained to which, the petitioner wanted to demarcate. On the order of Sub Divisional Officer, the land was to be measured but the informant side created chaos and it was the reason, the land could not be measured. He submitted that the doctor did not mention the reason for finding the injury to be grievous in nature. No fracture was found and only swelling was there on the neck of the informant.

5. On the otherhand, learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that the petitioner along with other accused persons badly assaulted the informant.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33743 of 2025(3) dt.09-10-2025 3/3 below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 618 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

7. The petitioner shall remain present physically each and every date before the court below till framing of the charges.

8. After accepting the bail bonds, the learned court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that he is involved in any other case except the present case, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T