Harendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4791 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -239 Year- 2015 Thana -DARAUNDA District- SIWAN ====================================================== Harendra Yadav Son of Harishankar Yadav, Resident of Village - Harsatali, P.S. - Daraunda, District - Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 239 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The petitioner is named in the First Information Report having allegation that he assaulted Hareram Yadav with rifle on his leg. Allegation for opening fire is against other co-accused and not against the petitioner. Co-accused Ramakant Yadav, Ramesh Yadav and Santosh Yadav have been allowed bail by another coordinate Benches of this Court and the petitioner is in custody since 09.09.2015. Chargesheet has already been submitted and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4791 of 2016 (3) dt.29-03-2016 2/2 there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is also directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Siwan in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 239 of 2015 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T