Shiv Kumar Datta v. The State Of Bihar, Through Arun Kumar Sinha, The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1329 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19899 of 2016 ====================================================== Shiv Kumar Datta son of Late Tej Narayan Datta, Resident of VillageDhouni, P.O. and Police Station- Tarapur, District- Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Arun Kumar Sinha Father's name not known to the petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Sinchai Bhawan, (Third Secretariat) P.S. Gardanibagh, Town and District Patna-1 2.

Shailesh, Father's name not known to the petitioner, the Chief Engineer, Sinchai Srijan, Water Resources Department, Bhagalpur Zone, Office at Barari, PS Kotwali (Indistrial Area), Town and district Bhagalpur 3.

Dwijendra Kumar Mishra, Father's name not known to the petitioner, the Executive Engineer, Sinchai Srijan, Water Resources Department, Irrigation Division, Bijji Kharwa, P.S. Belhar, District Patna 4.

Adesh Titarmare, father's name not known to the petitioner, the District Magistrate, Bhagalpur, P.S.- Kotwali, Town and District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Purushottam Kumar Das, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anjani Kumar - AAG 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 15-05-2019 By the order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No.19899 of 2016 the case of the petitioner for regularization was directed to be considered in the light of the earlier judgment of this Court passed in C.W.J.C. No.49 of 2017 (Manoj Kumar Singh versus the State of Bihar & Ors.). A supplementary show cause is filed on behalf of the opposite party No.2 enclosing an order dated 07.05.2019 whereby such regularization has taken place but it does not satisfy the

Patna High Court MJC No.1329 of 2018(4) dt.15-05-2019 2/2 petitioner on some grounds for which he prays for time. In my opinion, in the nature of the order passed by this Court requiring the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for regularization that, it has resulted in one such order passed on 07.05.2019, in case it aggrieves the petitioner on any count, the forum would be otherwise and not in a contempt application and the petitioner if so advised can take recourse thereto.

The contempt application is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/- U