Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5257/2016bail granted

Vishal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-03-30Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5257 of 2016 (3) dt.30-03-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5257 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -132 Year- 2015 Thana -BUXAR MUFFSIL District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Vishal Yadav S/o Ramful Yadav, resident of Village- Kulhariya, P.S.- Buxar (M), District- Buxar..... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashwini Kumar Rai For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md . Ansural Haque (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 30-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the Sate.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Buxar (M) P.S. Case No. 132 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 307 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner assaulted Santosh Kumar Yadav with Farsa 4-5 times and caused threats to other people. Submission is of false implication due to land dispute, no offence under Section 307 IPC is made out, the petitioner has voluntarily surrendered on 12.01.2016 and since then he is in custody and the injuries found on the person of Santosh Yadav have been found simple in nature which is evident from supplementary report annexed with the case diary at page 16 and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration to which learned APP opposes.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5257 of 2016 (3) dt.30-03-2016 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Buxar (M) P.S. Case No. 132 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T