Rajmani Swami @ Jarmani Yadav @ Rajmani Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33237 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2025 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Rajmani Swami @ Jarmani Yadav @ Rajmani Yadav S/o Chand Kishore Prasad Yadav R/o Village- Beldhana, P.S.- Chandi, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajiv Nayan, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 21-05-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and apprehended his arrest in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 145 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 192, 126(2), 115(2), 74, 132, 121(2), 352, 351(2), 125(2) and 125(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.
3. As per FIR police personnel were deterred to discharge their official functions while raiding Barkhanda
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33237 of 2025(2) dt.21-05-2025 2/3 Village, upon information that illegal country made liquor is being manufacturing thereof.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that narration of FIR suggests that petitioner not found involved in alleged occurrence. It is submitted that name of petitioner transpired during the course of occurrence on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused persons namely Sonu and Ram Nandan Yadav. It is pointed out that petitioner is a practicing advocate and on the said date and time of occurrence, he was in the Civil Court Hilsa, Bihar Shariff in connection with professional engagement. It is pointed out that no police personnels received any visible injuries during the occurrence. While concluding the argument learned counsel submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances and by taking note of the fact as name of petitioner transpired on the basis of disclosure made by apprehended co-accused
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33237 of 2025(2) dt.21-05-2025 3/3 persons, where no visible injury was noticed upon any police personnel, coupled with the fact as petitioner is a man of clean antecedent, accordingly the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-V-cum Special Judge, Excise-I, Bihar Shariff, Nalanda/concerned Trial Court where the case is pending in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 145 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) S.Tripathi/- U T