← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32848/2019bail granted

Jhulan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-06-26Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32848 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2018 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== JHULAN YADAV, S/o Late Driver Yadav, R/o village- Sinha, P.S.- Barhara, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Atul Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 26-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Ara Nagar P.S. Case No.230 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 414, 401, 467, 468, 471, 120-B Indian Penal Code.

Prayer of the petitioner for bail was earlier rejected by co-ordinate Bench of this Court with liberty to renew the prayer after three months from the date of framing of Charge. Thereafter, petitioner again moved this Court, which was rejected by order dated 27.02.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No.11772 of 2019 with observation to renew the prayer after three months from the date of framing of charge. Counsel for the petitioner submits that Charge has already been framed on 25.01.2019, which also finds mention in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32848 of 2019(2) dt.26-06-2019 2/2 the order dated 27.02.2019.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Ara Nagar P.S. Case No.230 of 2018, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner.

Further, (i) the petitioner will remain present on each and every date of trial, (ii) His absence on two consecutive date(s) without any reasonable cause will make his bail bond liable to be cancelled, and (iii) the petitioner will not intimidate the witnesses in any way and will not hamper the trial. (Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T